Ivy Leaf's Diary

2008

 

 

January 2008:

 

Living in a new area, my husband and I decided to spend New Year's Eve at a hotel and enjoy ready-made bonhomie rather than invent our own. We've been exhausted recently with the move of house and simply wanted to relax whilst somebody else provided the fun. I must say, at the dinner dance, the guests were well-dressed, but sadly in that 'expensive clothes but no clue about foundations' mode that I was rather hoping would have become a historical feature of the early 2000's. One robust lady, wearing a tight chiffon blouse and long satin skirt was the worst example. Her panty-line was alarmingly visible as was the roly-poly spare tyre. Her thin brassiere cut into her back, was mis-hooked and worn far too high thereby squeezing more rolls of flesh above and below the offending garment. To cap it all were pads that perched uncomfortably (and unevenly) just off the ends of her shoulders. Didn't her husband mention anything? Didn't she look in the mirror? I'm probably as robustly built as that women, but at least my flesh is controlled properly. If it wasn't, I would expect my husband to mention it. I might not be pleased, but his comments would show that he cared. Perhaps that's the answer, they just don't care.

 

Being on a table for two allowed us ample opportunity for people watching. Across the room, there appeared a sad sight. A husband and wife who appeared to have nothing to say to each other and certainly did not seem to be enjoying the party. The woman looked very 'po-faced' (if you know that expression) and stared disapprovingly at the younger elements in the room whilst the husband simply looked bored. After several hours of inactivity, a bit after eleven, the lady suddenly became animated and dragged her husband towards the dance floor. Without cracking her expression, she jerked around to the famous 'chicken song'. The spectacle was so hilariously incongruous with this disapproving and prim lady strutting around the dance floor, that she received a round of applause at the end! On returning to her seat, not a hair on her coiffured head had moved and I noticed that nary a bulge spoiled the line of her old-fashioned evening dress.

My husband was moved to comment "You know, she must have been quite a stunner in her youth!" I agreed, the lady was indeed very elegant, well-dressed and obviously appreciated the benefit of a firm foundation, but what experience had caused her to adopt such an expression? My husband produced a picture that we came across in Holland recently that seemed to beg for a suitable caption. Suggestions like "Ooh, that's rather tight, have you a smaller size?" spring to mind, however, this is so like the lady of last night that we felt that we should include it here.

 

 

Invisible Lacing:

 

I will not even attempt a short history of social attitudes towards corsetry, save to say that wearing corsets used to be the norm and the garments were discussed frequently. As the corset declined, so wearing became rarer and even clandestine, as some matrons, well aware that their peers had moved onto the girdle, still required the support of a laced foundation to maintain their figures. To cater for these discreet wearers, or perhaps for the women who required a 'waist' for the evening came 'invisible lacing'. I had only ever seen this before in the catalogues of Ambrose Wilson, however, last year I purchased a gorgeous Rigby & Peller girdle from the 1970's that had discreet back-lacing. Recently, I found an example from Warners, so perhaps these devices for the vain were more common that I had believed!

Note how the box refers to a 'Tie-up top'. No mention of laces here!

 

 

The Mystery Girdle

 

Last year we dwelt at some length upon a Spirella girdle that I could not identify. We have several in our collection and a reader had raised a query at the same time. At last, and purely by chance, I saw for sale an American Spirella brochure from the 1960's, and there was something close to the mystery girdle. Amazingly, it is advertised as a 205, but the cut is quite different from the British version. Our corsetiere friends explained that the British and American styles began to diverge with the advent of the girdle. Differences in fabrics and cut evolve on the two sides of the Atlantic but it seems that the nomenclature stayed the same. So is the problem solved that these are American Spirellas?  Not quite since the girdles we possess were made in Britain (the Spirella label is quite distinct). It may be that this was an older British 205 style that Spirella copied for clients who preferred not to change. Spirella were very obliging in this way and as more than one corsetiere remarked with feeling, "Never under-estimate the elderlys' reluctance to change!" I must add of course, that this reluctance to embrace change made a lot of commission for the fitters who kept their clients in corsets

and girdles well after such a fashion had ceased to be popular. On the other hand, if you've worn a corset for decades, you cannot suddenly do without it overnight, and in some cases perhaps never. Some women were in tears when Spirella sold out to Spencer, even though Spencer made (and still makes) an excellent front-laced corset. Sadly, it is the price of these corsets today that reduces one to tears. I know of several ladies who cannibalise their old corsets just to keep one pair in service.

 

 

February 2008:

It never fails to amaze me that correspondence can dry up for weeks and then suddenly a flurry of letters and emails will arrive. It is rather like hunting for collectables on Ebay (or waiting for a bus adds my husband). Roger K provided some humorous anecdotes gleaned from his encyclopaedic collection of articles, a Finnish lady told us of her web-site and provided some amazing examples of Finnish corsetry, and an American Gentleman recounted his experiences of what women wore in the 1960's to 1980's. The latter has been published as correspondence between the gentleman and myself simply to illustrate how an adolescent curiosity with female underwear can be turned into valuable historical data. I always stress to my gentleman correspondents that without their recollections, the history of corsetry would be less well understood. Remember that classic description from Ian McRoberts where he describes his elderly wife "Buckling and strapping herself into the satin tube that was her underwear!" How eloquent; one can almost see the garment, however, no woman would have written that phrase. After all, to most women, our underwear is an everyday fact and neither worth remembering nor recounting; it takes man to do that!

 

Three erudite articles passed our way recently. Firstly, our regular correspondent, Roger K, provided us with an update on girdle sales statistics, followed closely by a similar article on bra sales, and a few days later, I found a paper on brassiere size calculations (pdf format). Brassieres are notoriously difficult to size, and Spirella corsetieres had the most trouble with these garments. The female torso is very three-dimensional (my husband's words; I would have said voluptuous) and rarely symmetrical. Some of our fitters refused to fit upper garments since latterly the quality was not up to previous standards and complaints became the norm. I know of one woman who refused to wear anything other than Spirella but was disappointed with the fit of her brassieres. Eventually, the corsetiere ordered her brassieres with 'soft' side-lacers; rather a poor compromise to adjust the fit. Nevertheless, the old lady continued with these brassieres until Spirella sold out to Spencer. The Spencer brassieres were no better and amazingly, in the 1990's, Spencer lost the templates for its best selling brand, the 190. Spencer has sold hardly any brassieres since.

 

 

March 2008: 

The web site has a repository for humorous anecdotes and stories that we glean from our readers and acquaintances. These are normally put into Corsetiere's Stories, however, I must relate this conversation I had with friends who were visiting us in our new location. Incidentally, I hate moving and am thankful that we have fairly well settled down at last.

 

We were having lunch in our 'local' pub. My husband was chatting with my friend's husband about the merit of the local beer or cars or rugby or something when their prattle ceased and we followed their eyes towards a woman that was standing by the fire. She had taken off her cardigan and revealed unusually powerful arms. "Horse rider" said my husband "Look at those arms; you need power to control a horse!" We agreed. Living in the country we meet many of the 'horsey' set and I have to admit that I admire their confidence and deportment. This lead us onto a discussion of failing strength in the arms and nimbleness of the fingers in the elderly. "She'll be OK" volunteered my husband regarding the girl. Although age may have its disadvantages, it certainly increases the store of anecdotes lurking in one's mind and don't we just love to tell them! My friend was first:- "My granny had strong arms until the day she died. She worked on the land during the war, you know. She used to put on a heavy pair of corsets every morning, lace them really tight, and not take them off until retiring. During the day she'd fill the boiler with coal, work in the garden, and wring the washing out. They were tough then!" Whether her feats of endurance and strength were due to her corsets or the exercise involved in lacing them was unasked. Personally, I've known as many women who were dexterous with the myriads of hooks-and-eyes, laces, buckles and straps of their underwear, as were finally defeated by the daily chore of wearing such complicated garments. My friend's husband chipped in. "Auntie M. used to stay with us. When she went to her room each night I could hear this terrible ripping sound. My mother explained that it was the velcro on her corset!" Many older women tried velcro fastenings; it was marketed as easier for those with arthritic fingers, however, the sound effects put as many off! My husband had the final say, and recounted meeting a relatively petite woman who had extremely muscular arms. He enquired whether she was an equestrienne to which she retorted "No. I used to be a baggage handler at Kennedy International!"

 

 

Nancy Millar's Book:

 

 

 

Unmentionable History of the West

Nancy Millar

Hi Ivy Leaf,                                                 Letter to Ivy Leaf, 2006

 

It's a wonderful website. I am the author of the Unmentionable History of the West, a book that's to come out later this fall (2006) about underwear and how it affected the history of women in western Canada. ............. It's a serious book and takes underwear seriously. Incidentally, I have a story on Spirella since one of the women I interviewed in Red Deer, AB, was a Spirella agent before she went onto local politics and ended up with a major road named for her in that city. See where corsets can take you?

 

Thanks for your consideration,

Nancy Millar

 

P.S.  The book is to be published by Red Deer Press. I have written other books on history.

 

This is the sort of corset my mother wore in the 1930s and 40s ...

I tried to figure out how to lace this thing up!

 

 

Fashions and Disturbing Social Indicators:

 

My husband and I dislike flying intensely; in fact I nowadays avoid it, but my husband must follow the dictates of his job and, when absolutely necessary, resort to the air. He had to visit the Far East recently and, against his wishes to use Singapore Airlines, was given a seat on British Airways; business class thank Goodness, for the 13 long hours to Kuala Lumpur. He returned several days later in as remarkably agreeable mood as one can have at 5.30 in the morning. "Thoroughly impressed!" he replied to my questions about the trip. "I've not flown BA for years and they were (word deleted - Ivy) excellent!" "Fine wine, good films and a flat bed - a really flat bed. Horizontal in fact! I actually slept!" Later he praised the stewardesses for their charm and style, and expounded upon the elegant new tailored uniform that BA has had commissioned. Apparently the new tailored design has replaced, the silky, but rather informal previous efforts. Inevitably, we started to draw the parallels, of outer fashion, inner fashion and the times in which we live.

 

After the war, airline stewardesses wore derivatives of uniforms from the armed forces, often complete with shirt and tie. No designer's name was connected with these outfits. In the late 1960's, designers were commissioned, however, the styles were still very smart and tailored. Cavanagh, Evans and then Hardie Amies and Baccarat Wetherall dressed the flight attendants of the days in fitted suits and dresses. Only in summer plumage was a slight informality enjoyed. As the military uniform gave way to the tailored uniform, so did girdles and suspender belts get replaced by lighter garments, until the 1980's when the floppy silks of Klein and Costelloe reflected a society beginning to enjoy unparalleled wealth and freedom. If stewardesses wore any foundations at all during this period, it really would have been unnecessary in the flowing informal fabrics favoured by these designers. The newest, tailored look heralds a return to the days of Amies and Baccarat Wetherall. Foundations have gone the same way, and from the dearth of lower foundations available in the 1980's and 90's, the stores are now full of 'shapers', the new name for the panty-girdle. For historical observers, much as birds and animals go quiet well before an earthquake, so does fashion become more formal and structured before a crisis. Sadly, it seems that crisis is knocking at our doors.

 

Terminal Note:

As a footnote, I must add that the article above was written before the opening of Terminal 5 on the 27th March. Oh dear! I hope the 2012 Olympics (if we ever get that far) will be handled better. No doubt everybody tried their best, but it will hardly seduce me to leave terra firma.

 

April 2008:  White Brassieres

Whilst on the theme of air travel, I was delighted to receive an instruction manual for British Caledonian airways. I hoped to lay low the myth of rules mandating the wearing of girdles. Indeed, on the pages devoted to female cabin crew, it simply states "Only white underwear may be worn underneath the uniform blouse. A bra must always be worn --- Tights or stockings are to be seamless." So, bras were mandatory, so was colour (the regulation blouses were white). How you achieved elegance and deportment, however, was up to the individual who, like all women, would wear what their peers wore.

 

My husband recounts how during exams at Oxford University in the early 1970's, when women had to wear a white shirt or blouse, coloured bras were prohibited. It was feared that the male concentration might be diverted from Pliny or Aristotle at the sight of some ghastly Marks & Spencer hue looming provocatively through one's neighbour's blouse. Just as British Caledonian's uniform remained unchanging for two decades because it was just so smart and so correct, so did the hideous coloured foundations of the late 1970's die a quick and grateful death since they simply were not.

 

Apparently the American University featured in the charming Maidenform cartoon (right) had no such rules!

 

We received recently, Frangard's fifth chapter of his amazing story. We are so grateful to accounts from Frangard and others who bring back to life the world of Gardners and the legendary Iris Norris.

 

 

White Tummies!

We recently visited what soon will become part of history; the travel agency. The young lady attending had been issued with a smart uniform of jacket, blouse and trousers with a silk scarf in the company's colours. Our hearts were gladdened to see such style in a girl barely out of school. Unfortunately, when she walked to her desk we saw that her trousers were cut so low as to be almost indecent and that the hem of her jacket only came to the top of her trousers if she remained vertical and motionless. As she bent over to retrieve a brochure, her blouse and jacket rose well above her waist?- hip-band to reveal a pale expanse of overfed flesh. When she sat and faced us a bulge of tummy protruded from her ensemble and quivered alarmingly as she spoke. She was perfectly polite however and very pretty, but whether my husband's attention was distracted or not, she failed to make a sale.

 

Bulging tummies, my own is carefully controlled thanks to Spencer, featured twice in conversation during a trip we made to Wales over Easter. The old friend, with whom we stayed, is rather large in the bottom half and was extolling the virtues of 'spandex' to the extent that my husband became quite embarrassed. She was in the throes of preparing for her son's wedding, and her outfit, that she modelled for us, was skillfully cut to hide her excesses. "You wait until I've got my spandex on!" she said. That fact that she hadn't donned her foundation indicated that something of a struggle was required. "It's so strong, but not like the old days," she added. A day-trip to one of my remoter cousins revealed a creature who might as well have come from a different species. Widowed from a very wealthy husband, she lived alone in a huge (and frighteningly) expensive house. Years of holidaying in the sun had left her with what my husband calls 'lizard skin', that is permanently yellowish and covered with a myriad of tiny wrinkles. Years ago, she had had a succession of cosmetic enhancements that had not withstood the test of time, and her rather uneven (and small) bosom sat uncomfortably with her wide shoulders. She had no bottom at all, something you rarely see outside the very elderly yet she sported a distinct 'spare tyre', a flaw on her otherwise skeletal frame that was exacerbated by her tight jumper and slacks. Nevertheless, she still carried herself with that casual elegance of the very wealthy. The conversation turned to herself, as it often did, and she candidly remarked on her bulging waist. "What can I do?" she wailed. "I NEED a man" she added, staring pointedly at my husband who flushed bright red, "but who wants these!" She tugged at her waist viciously. "Spandex!" said my husband, somewhat louder than he meant. Her predatory gaze bored into him as she performed an instant analysis of wealth, stamina and availability. I came to his rescue with suggestions about Flexees, cinches and the like and reluctantly she agreed that this was probably the way forward. On the way home in the evening, my poor husband was moved to comment "You know, I've never see a preying mantis with love handles before! Mind you, she's not unattractive" he added. "Oh yes she is!" I retorted, and we left the matter there.

 

We were lucky enough to come across a black orchid (artificial satin) Spirella 305 corset. This immaculate, un-worn garment is 19 inches long with a waist of 28 - 30 inches. The metal zipper dates it to the late 1970's and there is a good chance that the material is of a better quality than the later black orchid which tended to split. Spirella withdrew black in 1986 just before they sold out to Spencer. One of my own black corsets that I bought then split after the first few wearings!

 

 

What you see - may not be what you get!

 

Whilst perusing the auction sites I came across a classic piece of advertising. All sellers and marketers know that a tall, slim garment looks far better than a short broad one. For this reason, models are chosen to be tall and thin, exactly the sort of women who wouldn't dream of wearing the garment in the first place; well, after the 1960's that is! Regard the image on the packet, and the reality of the girdle that is far broader than it is long.

 

Fortunately, our gorgeous new Spirella is just appealing in reality as the advertising suggests! My only regret is that it is simply too small for me!

The advertisement on the left, and the doctored photograph of the girdle on the right (a frequent auction house ploy) are mocked by the reality in the centre (below).

 

 

Whatever happened to Strodex?

One of the problems associated with constructing a web-site, is that searches for new information keep on turning up one's own work, either directly or indirectly. I recently came across an alarming Strodex surgical corset that we acquired in 1975 with a shaped abdominal panel in tea-rose brocade to contain a pendulous abdomen. On searching for Strodex on the internet, my husband found the title of this piece from Ivy :Leaf's Diary of 2003. It was penned after buying a rather pretty Strodex corselette, the antithesis of the formidable abdominal support. None of our acquaintances nor their mothers or grannies wore Strodex. If they had made-to-measure it was Spirella or Spencer. The only additions to our knowledge are as diverse as the two examples we already possess; a very attractive long brassiere (sometimes called a 'combinaire') and a fearsome back support. Its seems that Strodex, based in Leicestershire where the cotton mills were, produced as diverse a range as the more widely-purchased competition.

 

 

May 2008: Time Warps and the Hippo

Our new location in rural England has transported us back in time half a decade. One leaves the car park that is laughingly called a motorway, and as the A-roads become B-roads, so a magical transformation occurs and one discovers that the picture postcard village still exists. Sadly, prices seem to be immune from this time warp. Fashions similarly have moved on and, although the elderly denizens of such villages are well past retirement age, jeans seem to be standard dress, even for Lady S., who owns the home farm. A farm labourer's cottage, that a hundred years ago was basically fit for demolition, now costs the best part of a million pounds so popular is the time warp. Nevertheless, the village in which we live boasts an excellent inn that serves my husband's favourite choice of beers and a fierce local cider that has become my standard tipple. In winter, the locals own the public bar, but as summer approaches, so the tourists appear and excellent opportunities for people watching abound. The other week, during Sunday roast lunch (at which the inn excels), a singular couple appeared. The man was a huge, shambling creature with a girth of door challenging dimensions, but his wife was a small, dainty woman who at some point had decided that she should remain frozen in time somewhere in the 1950's. Twin-set and pearls, enamelled face, lacquered, tightly-permed hair (or was it a wig?) and lipstick that bore only a passing acknowledgement of the actual extent of her lips. She looked like a china model of a 1950's Englishwoman so limited were her facial movements. She fussed and fretted at her enormous spouse who seemed only vaguely aware of her presence. I suspected that the woman had purchased her final wardrobe (and underpinnings) decades earlier for no woman has a tummy that flat without the serious corsetry of yesterday. We had seen a similar couples years before and I wondered if it was a reaction to her husband's 'going to seed' that had determined the wife to retain herself like some unchanging museum piece? The contrast between the prim and fussy woman and her gross spouse led my husband to compare the man to a hippopotamus, with his wife as the tiny white bird that fusses and pecks at the monstrous river horse of Africa. I thought the analogy rather appropriate!

 

Recollections

Although we receive a wealth of stories and recollections from female acquaintances, it is men that often provide the humorous or detailed anecdotes. The correspondence or conversation usually proceeds along the lines of "Odd subject you fellows study!" or "Can't remember really - not interested in that sort of thing!" This is invariably followed by  a minutely detailed account of the gentleman's wife's underpinnings. Of course, in those days many men were quite unaware of their wife's foundations other than through the bills. In the morning, the wife would arise and vacate the bedroom surrounded by a protective barrier of wincyette or nylon, and not reappear until all bits and pieces were in their proper place, and decently covered too! Perhaps it's my Dutch upbringing, and not until recently having the benefit of a dressing room, but my husband knows exactly how I look 'before' and 'after'. Sadly, there's rather more of a difference than there used to be, not least the rise and fall of my ample bosom. Why is it that men find breasts attractive? They are heavy, sweaty and expensive to support (breasts I mean, not men). But back to some recollections. One gentleman recounted how angry his wife would get when hooking up her corselette. She would finish the process only to find that somewhere in the middle, one hook and eye had come apart. It's amazing how difficult it is to re-attach the little devil in the middle without starting again. The gentleman remembered that there were 18 hooks involved. I'm certain his wife never knew that! (I have to add, since I've done it frequently, that the most frustrating exercise is to finish the hooks-and-eyes, or buttons on a blouse, to discover one empty hook at the top and one empty eye at the bottom. Start again!! Another wife was driven to a frenzy, again by hooks-and-eyes, but this time on her corset. She was donning a Camp side-lacer and she simply could not get the edges to meet. "I can't have put on that much weight" she wailed as she struggled to force the contraption closed. Amazingly, she did get it half on before her husband quietly pointed out that the middle buckle on the left side had not been released! The extra two inches returned the corset to its normal size. "You might have told me!" was all the thanks he got.

 

 

June 2008:  Corsets and the Moral High Ground

We have written at length about the 'feel' of corsets, implying the physical sensation, however, there is a mental counterpart equally important. Our corsetiere friend from the south coast still has a client who claims that wearing corsets makes her feel good. This is nothing to do with the physical support, but more the feeling of being properly attired. She claims to 'feel like a real women', and this is by no means one of our friend's elderly clients. A new acquaintance from our village told me of her aunt who belonged to the Salvation Army. Normally she wore a girdle, but when she wore her uniform, she wore a corset. She candidly explained this to my friend during one of her holiday visits. The uniform would have fitted perfectly well without the corset, but, so the aunt maintained, it made her feel 'better', more morally upstanding (probably quite literally!) How curious is the human ego and the perception of the moral high-ground. Give two identical people airline tickets; one economy and one business class. The traveller in business class is not just far better cosseted, but actually feels superior to his or her identical peer in economy. The same phenomenon is apparent in large four-wheel-drive vehicles. The person with the higher eye-level feels superior to anybody at a lower level. Car companies make fortunes selling these behemoths on the basis of this perceived status. I think that a member of the Salvation Army would be horrified to be accused of pride, but without a doubt, the lady in question felt that her corsets in some way elevated her above her peers.

 

Noisy Tennis

I have a passion for watching tennis that is completely out of proportion to my limited abilities to play the sport (and that was three decades ago)! I watched an incredibly vocal Russian lady play another Russian at the beginning of the French Open. What a racket (and I mean the noise not the tennis). The appalling grunting that the lady produced was off-putting to myself, let alone the poor opponent. A hundred years ago when women played tennis, they wore long skirts and bustles. The only sound heard was the pat-pat of the ball and the creaking of the players’ stays, the poor garments being quite unused to the heat and activity of such an un-ladylike event!

 

Some weeks later

Good gracious; she's at it again in Wimbledon but seems to have been knocked out of the tournament. My husband was busy in the study editing some new text that we have recently received and came through to ask what the noise was! That reminds me, that in our attempt to glean knowledge of world-wide corsetry, we have never come across any Russian products. Perhaps they were not allowed after the era of the Tsars.

 

 

The Russians appreciated corsetry and silence before the revolution (Princess Ella)

 

 

 

July 2008:  Spencer and Bulges

We were lucky enough to acquire  Spencer Catalogue from 1934. This images are stunning and of a quality that reminds us of Barcley, the up-market, break-away renegade from Spencer. The catalogue contains many advertisements and 'banishing the bulge' was the clarion call to all women. Of course, I am not so naive as to believe that all women were elegant in 1934, however, regard three images from 1934, 1971 (right) and 2008 (below).

 

The gross abdomen of 2008 may not be a  recent phenomenon, but, as I have mentioned ad nauseam, the blatant display is. As my husband once suggested "An instant cure for voyeurism!" Certainly there are advertisements today that show shapely women, but often the feeble spandex  fails to conceal the bulges. This is obviously not the case with the ladies on the right.

 

It was whilst watching tennis at Wimbledon recently that our attention was drawn to the number of superbly fit female players sporting a distinct 'spare tyre'. I'm not advocating that these modern Amazons resort to playing in their 'stays', but I simply want to know why the bulges have returned?

  

 

 

Demise of the Corsetieres

There are precious few of these dedicated ladies left. Many who entered the trade after the war to supplement their husbands' poor wages, began to leave in the 1970's as proper lower foundations (corsets and girdles) gave way to the panty-girdle that, frankly, does not require too much training to fit.  A few soldiered on and it has been our privilege to meet some of them, however, even the remaining stalwarts are quitting the business. Their clientele is dying and the cost of these made-to-measure garments exorbitant. Our friend from Exeter has just retired after five decades of service. Simply put, a corset, even a standard 305 (sorry; the Spencer equivalent), costs well over £100. The state pension is about £100 per week which is a third of what the government calls the poverty level. If our friend went to see a client or vice versa, the petrol costs at an astonishing £6 per UK gallon (that is over $10 per US gallon according to my husband), are simply prohibitive. Sadly, many of the humorous cartoons of the sea-side genre, depicting stout women struggling to get into their stays with some caption like "I can't make ends meet!" has now come to pass.

 

 

Humour

One of the reasons that my husband and I have been together for over 30 years without ever arguing, is an ability to laugh at ourselves, life in general and to find humour in innocent situations. We have chuckled in the past at the very descriptive term "noisy nylon" used to describe the material beloved by Spirella wearers in the 1970's. It was, indeed, noisy but so easy to wash and dry that it became extremely popular. Many an itinerant corsetiere heard the susurration of noisy nylon drying on the washing lines in the wind, rather than the wind itself. A Spirella brassiere was recently advertised at auction as "Russelly nylon". Oh dear, I suspect they meant the word to spell rustley, but perhaps the seller was overcome with the image of Jane Russell, the quintessential brassiere model.

 

 

August 2008:  Thanks to all our Readers

 

Ivy Leaf and her long-suffering husband wish to thank everybody who has visited the web-site, and especially those who have contributed recollections, articles and have made contact with us. It is so gratifying that the labour of love that we started in 2002 has been visited over one million times. In itself, that is praise indeed! If you have anything to contribute, particularly along the lines of 'who wore what, when', please don't hesitate to contact us.

 

ivyleaf@corsetiere.net

 

 

A Trip to Holland and a Wedding

 

If nothing else reveals the age of myself and my husband, it must be the prodigious number of great-nieces and great-nephews that our families have produced. Fortunately they are all well-brought up and call me Auntie, rather than 'The Great Aunt', that corseted virago described so well in Arthur Ransome's childrens' stories. I might wear corsets but I am NOT a virago (I hope). To some close members of the family I am known as the 'corset auntie', partly because of my old-fashioned underwear and partly because they know of my general interest in corsetry. It was at a wedding in Utrecht recently that my sister-in-law introduced me to a rather smart, elderly lady with the enigmatic words that we had much in common. It was the lady that broke the ice with "I understand you still wear corsets; so do I!" Trust the Dutch to speak their minds. Two English ladies could, and probably would, talk around the matter for hours, days even and then never quite get to the point. It transpired that the lady had worn a Camp corset for years, just as her mother had done. Her problem was, as it is for all corset-wearers, diminishing supply. She had purchased corsets from Coja for years, but the Basko Camps corsets latterly were sturdy, but hardly feminine. She candidly agreed that she was vain (what lady is not), and nothing held her stomach in check like a Camp, but she lamented the passing of the glorious materials once available. We talked on this theme for a while, at least two glasses of red wine's worth, until my husband appeared and dragged the conversation back into English. "Look at the bridesmaids" he exclaimed. "Surely they could have made their dresses fit?" The lady and I regarded the frumpish, overweight bridesmaids bulging through the shiny material of their poorly cut dresses, every line of their insubstantial underwear embossed for all to see. As if on a signal, the lady and I smoothed our skirts over our hips in an automatic reaction. We nearly collapsed with laughter and left my poor husband muttering "Women!"

 

In April's entry, we commented on various airline and university rules that dictated that white underwear should be worn under white blouses. We uncovered an old Maidenform advertisement where, apparently, the university had different rules! Even today, British Airways mandates that the underwear of their female staff "should be discreet and not show through the blouse."

 

We purchased recently a copy of the trade journal 'Corsets and Brassieres'. What a delightful throw-back to a vanished era, or is it? Reading the journal and seeing past the many advertisements (something my husband found quite difficult I might add), it is simply a trade journal where products are displayed and advice is proffered on how to turn those products into profit. Wasn't it ever thus? We recently met a young saleswoman in a car showroom who indiscreetly proclaimed that she could sell cars or corsets with equal facility! Since she drove a rather nice car but was badly, and blatantly in need of proper foundations, I suspect that an appreciation of your product gives even the best saleswoman the edge.

The Corsets and Brassiere trade journal of June 1952

 

 

September 2008: Sport and Support

 

We touched on the matter of noisy female tennis players some months back and how some of the top players might actually benefit from a bit of 'shaping'. The recent Olympics (and didn't Holland do well for a small country) revealed that if you wear a skin-tight swimming suit you can go faster than your opponents and look pretty lithe into the bargain. It reminded me of an advertisement by Playtex in 1960's where a swimming champion endorsed the brand not least because you could wear the girdle whilst swimming! In fact, if you consider some swimsuits of the 1960's, especially those made by Spirella, the structure is basically a coloured corselette complete with bones and a back zip! As for cycling shorts, just don't get my husband started on that one! "Good Heavens! My mother used to wear things like that. At least she had the decency to keep them under her clothes!"

The interior bra structure of a Spirella swimming costume from the 1960's