SHEER FABRICS
| In
the USA, some bras are advertised as sheer. However, the image of the modeled
garment shows nothing, and it might as well have been on a plastic manikin. In
some cases that alternative might even have been more appealing since modern
mannequins are quite lifelike with nipples showing in contour (but usually not
in color).
|
Alden's
depiction in 1965 of the "sheer nude look", certainly leaves a lot to
the imagination! Namely, a person has to really use their imagination to believe
that this bra is sheer (based on the ad image). That same year, JC Penny also
published an altered image of a transparent bra. Held up, it looks like a person
could read a newspaper through the fabric. However, the model is modestly
disguised. Interestingly, in that same catalog, JC Penny very openly showed how
the "natural look" was achieved with Lycra spandex power net stretched
over a very shapely derriere! 1960,
Montgomery Ward had already revealed the "Tiger" panty girdle (by
Peter Pan). A front garter is clearly visible on the long-leg style illustrated
in red, and that image indicates this garment was very sheer. Although some
long-leg panty girdles in this decade appeared to have garters on the outside of
the panty leg, I believe that this garter was an inside or "hidden"
garter. The only other long-leg panty girdle on this page was equipped with
hidden garters. Fifteen years later, the high waist panty girdle shown in Ward's
catalog had a "cheeky" view similar to the previous image in 1965 used
by JC Penny. |
|
|
|
By
1978, Montgomery Ward revealed that once again, women's breasts had nipples.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
However
a year later, Sears was still involved in a "cover-up". Its very
interesting to see that a lady's hand is clearly visible through the bra fabric
(inset), but the part of the body where it's usually worn, is completely
concealed. The sharp color printing used by Montgomery Ward in 1981 leaves no
doubt in my mind about this model's nipples and large areola!
Often,
the emphasis in European ads is on transparency. As shown here, there is no
question about the sheerness of the bra portion of this Barbara all-in-one. The
garments by Susa were similarly revealing.
|
|
Although
I only have been able to collect one example from Latin America, this
advertisement from a TV schedule magazine (Aug. 1998) from Guayaquil, Ecuador
illustrates a similar open (in more ways than one) attitude.

Before
the Sear's catalog folded (about 1993), many people were not aware that they
published different catalogs in different parts of the country. Some indication
of this may be observed from the alphanumeric codes at the bottom of most pages.
Sometimes the entry says, "All". (I suspect that other catalog companies followed this
practice, too.) I had relatives in New Jersey and was able to compare catalogs.
I found that items offered and how they were displayed would differ, depending
on location. While that was easy to understand for some products (like not
offering snow blowers in Florida), it is harder for me to understand why types
and styles of bras and girdles should vary and also how they were displayed. Was
there really a consideration of more prudishness in the South?
Advertising in newspapers seemed to vary widely, also. Possibly, this
depended on region and urban or rural areas. I recall some of the artist's
sketches for department stores in Jacksonville, FL were excellent (and some were
erotic).
Background
|
In
the early 1990's catalogs changed the type of background used for pictures.
Image background went from sterile white to more natural (like the inside of a
home) as color was used. When images were primarily black and white, I suspect
that a plain background was used to insure that the garment stood out.
The example from Lane Bryant in 1991 illustrates this trend. I
didn't see Sear's ever adopt this before the catalog folded. However, Just My
Size and JC Penny used this technique.
|
|
|
|
|